• A staff member is excited about social media…but the boss thinks they’re ridiculous and don’t jive with the company’s brand strategy.
• A PR effort has begun…but crucial players/interviewees disdain Web-based journalism and think journalists are covering the wrong story.
• An in-house B2B program has launched…but the sales team constantly resists, drags their feet, and refuses to get on board.

These are just three examples of ways in which lack of buy-in can undermine marketing efforts.  Sometimes the effects are just annoying and mosquito-like, but other times they can sabotage a business’ long-term potential for success.  And recently, I’ve seen several marketing programs falter, even fail, due to inconsistent buy-in across organizations.

What do I mean by buy-in? For the purposes of this discussion, I’ll define buy-in as support for a particular program or practice within an organization.  Buy-in is not always enthusiasm; it can be expressed by diverting manpower or dollars to a process.  In a perfect world, buy-in would mean that a project was really supported on all levels of an organization and given adequate resources and respect at all times.  Sadly, though, this is usually not the case, and achieving buy-in can be like a battle for hearts and minds.

So, how much buy-in do you need, anyway, to help a new program or mentality succeed? The answer will vary widely depending on the organization, the number of responsible parties, and the extent to which responsibility (or blame) has been spread across an organization.  Usually, it’s good to establish a point person with a high level of enthusiasm for the project who has, ahead of time, spent some time thinking about why the program is a good idea and why it deserves the company’s buy-in.  This point person can then identify allies and enthusiastic or competent parties throughout the organization as they implement the new plan.

The problem with the one-person, one point of enthusiasm strategy is that if that person moves on or messes up, the blame can only go in one direction, often preventing the “failure” from becoming a learning experience.  To counter this, it’s often a good idea to make the planning process an inclusive one, even if that means much convincing has to go on up-front.  Bringing in the dreaded consultant can also help with buy-in…having someone on hand to ask the right questions, sculpt a strategy that makes sense based on an org’s current priorities and resources, and investing money up-front for that clarity can create a sense of buy-in from the start.

Let me put it bluntly:  no matter how good your plan, results are the best way to get buy-in.  It’s often more effective to do a small, successful pilot program before securing the big bucks to follow your dream. Think of carrots, not sticks.  How can this program directly benefit a certain department or decision-maker?  Whose blessing is most important?

Sadly, there will always be people who resist change.  The key is not necessarily to convert these people right away, but to balance sensitivity to their perspective with a very well-justified plan (or, even better, one that speaks their language — numbers if they’re a numbers person, pretty pictures if graphs speak to them, etc.).  A bit of assessment and planning up front (yes, that would be Erin encouraging you to shy away from reactive thinking and decision-making again) can help you create buy-in for the long term. –Erin

related posts:

1. this week in marketing, social media, and brand strategy
2. Five Ways to Fail Your Brand
3. Backscratchin’: 10 Ways to Use Social Media to Promote Others

One Response to “Is Lack of Buy-In Undermining Your Marketing?”